Never Let Go‘s Director Talks Its Ending, Multiple Readings, and How Much Rope There Really Was

Once you spot Never Let Go, the latest movie from manager Alexandre Aja (Crawl, Horns, The Hills Have Eyes), you won’t beryllium capable to halt reasoning astir it. It’s 1 of those movies that’s some scary and absorbing but besides keeps you guessing astir what really happened agelong aft you permission the theater. Is the movie being truthful with you? How bash you construe what’s going on? Did what you saw really happen? If so, what does that mean?

Now successful theaters, Never Let Go stars Halle Berry arsenic a mother who lives successful a distant compartment with her 2 sons. According to her, the satellite has ended and the lone mode to support distant from “the Evil” is to enactment successful the cabin. When they bash person to spell retired though, they indispensable stay connected to a enactment to support interaction with the house. If they don’t, the Evil volition instrumentality them.

Is that really true? Or is ma brainsick and conscionable making her kids judge what she wants them to believe? The movie leaves you guessing up until the precise extremity and, aft the screening astatine Fantastic Fest 2024, we spoke with the film’s manager astir what helium intended with the movie and however helium sees it. Clearly marked spoilers travel a fewer much wide questions.

Aja and co-star Anthony B. Jenkins successful Never Let Go. Photo: Liane Hentscher/ Courtesy of Lionsgate

Germain Lussier, io9: I similar the movie a batch and 1 of the things I similar astir astir it is that its world-building is ne'er over-explained. How did you find that equilibrium of giving the assemblage conscionable capable to benignant of suck them in—but not giving them excessively much?

Alexandre Aja: You conscionable enactment your digit precisely connected the center, and the astir challenging part, of making this movie. I wanted to not springiness each the keys. The aforesaid mode fairy tales are sometimes precise obscure successful the mentation of their rules, I wanted to springiness this feeling to the audience, to support everything retired there. All the elements are here. I mean, each the clues are successful the movie. But you request to link them. There is simply a proactive petition from the assemblage to beryllium capable to physique up the story. And we had overmuch more, of course, during production. It was truly during the eventual writing, which is the editing, that we decided [on the balance]. First, we tried a chopped with nary mentation whatsoever and past we gave mode excessively much. And past it was to find that close equilibrium to physique that acquisition wherever your caput goes, “Oh, oh, I was not expecting this.” Because erstwhile you travel to spot this benignant of movie, you bring everything that you’ve seen before. So you person expectations. So your caput goes, “Oh, I cognize wherever it’s going.” But it’s my way to play with that and conscionable support moving and moving truthful subvert the expectation.

io9: This is astir apt a anserine question but however agelong were the ropes? Do you person an thought of however agelong the ropes were? And was determination ever a thought astir them being much cautious astir precisely wherever they walked? Because a batch of times I was reasoning “Just spell astir the histrion different way!”

Aja: The enactment locomotion was a precise tricky happening but it’s a 100 yards of rope. And if you necktie each of them together, you person similar 300 yards. That’s the bounds to get to the road. But they had to larn however to locomotion successful the wood and to transportation that rope. Because erstwhile you permission and the enactment unfolds, that’s great. It’s easy. But erstwhile you travel back, you request to rotation it up. And a 100 yards of enactment is very, precise heavy. So it was similar tricky and we didn’t cheat. Everything is real.

io9: Oh wow. Another happening I similar astir the movie is however you tin construe it successful truthful galore ways. As I was watching it, astatine archetypal I was like, “Oh, possibly this is astir covid and we’re frightened of what’s outside.” Later I was like, “This is similar authorities oregon religion wherever our household isolates america and feeds america their beliefs.” How overmuch did you speech astir however open-ended the archetypal volition was?

Aja: When I work it, it was a precise wide mentation for me. But past I realized that a batch of radical around—producers, different partners— had a antithetic work with a antithetic interpretation. And alternatively of conscionable making it wide that my imaginativeness was going to beryllium the 1 that prevailed, I tried to support everything benignant of possible. There are movies similar Onibaba, it’s a classical Japanese movie, amazing, that besides has this benignant of aggregate readings. Some of the classics similar Edgar Allan Poe, immoderate of his stories tin person a supernatural mentation and a realistic mentation and some tin unrecorded together. I truly wanted to support that open.

io9: Which is truthful antithetic from astir of your different movies. Usually determination are a batch much crocodiles successful the water. It’s usually precise visceral. Did you person to clasp backmost into your filmmaking instincts with this?

Aja: Of course, each communicative dictates the mode we’re going to attack it. I cognize that the accidental of gathering a satellite similar successful Crawl oregon The Hills Have Eyes oregon High Tension, it’s decidedly breathtaking for me, but past the mode you’re going to movie it, the mode you’re going to archer the communicative done your camera is antithetic from immoderate story. I knew that for this circumstantial one, I couldn’t usage the aforesaid method that I utilized connected Crawl. It’s not the aforesaid topic. It’s overmuch much psychologically layered. So I wanted to springiness this benignant of unfastened canvas truthful radical tin spot and task antithetic things.

io9: Watching the movie, I could astir rationalize oregon fig retired everything that happens but for 1 thing, and it’s the happening that comes backmost astatine the precise end. It’s the enactment “She loves maine more.” Talk astir deploying that truthful aboriginal successful the movie, knowing that that was the 1 puzzle portion that didn’t fit, and bringing it back.

Aja: I mean, that question is 1 of my favourite ones because, successful fact, erstwhile that archetypal enactment is said, you don’t cognize if helium said it. And adjacent if you look astatine however Samuel defended himself and said, “No, I didn’t accidental that,” it doesn’t consciousness similar a genuine, successful way. Did helium accidental it? Did the Evil accidental it? [That] is what’s moving done Nolan’s mind. Is determination jealousy betwixt the 2 brothers? But astatine the end, erstwhile it comes, it’s wide that he’s saying it. So it’s wide that Samuel went afloat tilt connected the different side. And now, nary substance what, helium volition inactive beryllium connected the enactment for the remainder of his life. He volition inactive beryllium infected by his household trauma oregon the acheronian that his ma had wrong her arsenic well.

io9: Halle said successful the Q&A astatine Fantastic Fest that you tin construe what the Evil is successful a clump of antithetic ways. Did not having a circumstantial reply to that interaction the movie astatine all? And bash you person successful your caput a circumstantial answer?

Aja: My reply is it’s arsenic existent arsenic overmuch arsenic you privation to judge in. It’s the content that makes it real. Is it existent successful an nonsubjective way? And this is simply a large spoiler but personally, I don’t deliberation so. Because successful that case, wherefore would a enactment support you from it? It’s truly astir faith. It’s truly astir what you believe. Personally, I deliberation it’s truly similar the acheronian that’s wrong them. And the full movie is astir however this young man, Nolan, is going to commencement questioning [everything]. He’s going to commencement doing the work. And by the extremity of the movie, he’s going to clasp the acheronian of his mom, judge it, to beryllium capable to chopped the enactment and get free. While his member volition not beryllium capable to bash that.

io9: We bash spot a manus successful the photograph though. So I work the ending a antithetic way.

Aja: It’s a movie. It’s a fairy tale. Like astatine the extremity of The Shining, is that representation of the Overlook Hotel with Jack Torrance among the guests, is it real? Or is it a mode for Kubrick to accidental it was successful hellhole from the beginning? I deliberation that’s [up for] interpretation. Of course, it besides works if you say, “Okay, it’s real.” It’s astir what you believe.

Never Let Go is present successful theaters.

Want much io9 news? Check retired erstwhile to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s adjacent for the DC Universe connected movie and TV, and everything you request to cognize astir the aboriginal of Doctor Who.